← News
Premier League

Premier League Matchweek 3: When Does an Early Start Become a Real Trend?

After90

Premier League Matchweek 3 gives us the first real chance to test early-season trends. After90 examines six major questions involving Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester United, Manchester City, Tottenham and Hull.

After only two rounds of Premier League football, it is very easy to fall into the trap of making conclusions too early.

Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City and Hull City have all started with maximum points. Liverpool have drawn twice. Manchester United lost and then responded with five goals. Tottenham are still without a league goal, while Aston Villa are still searching for their first point.

But two matches do not define a season.

Matchweek 3 is where some early signals may begin to turn from small-sample noise into trends worth watching.

At After90Sports, we are not simply trying to predict ten winners this weekend.

We are looking for answers to six questions that may help us understand the shape of the season before the league table fully reveals it.


The Premier League itself may be changing

There is one number worth discussing before looking at any individual team.

The first two rounds produced 62 goals, an average of more than three per match.

According to Premier League analysis, the average number of fast attacks has also risen to:

2.5 per match compared with 1.9

And perhaps the most interesting number of all:

13 of the 32 goals scored in the previous round came from quick attacks following a change of possession.

That is not a minor detail.

We may be seeing the beginning of a tactical shift in the Premier League:

less patience in structured possession, and more willingness to attack immediately after winning the ball.

That is why Matchweek 3 matters.

If the pattern continues, we may have to stop describing these games simply as “open early-season matches.”

We may instead need to ask whether the Premier League is moving again toward a faster, more transitional style.


1. Arsenal vs Chelsea: Control Meets Chaos

This is clearly the biggest game of the round.

Both teams entered Matchweek 3 with two wins from two, but they reached six points in very different ways.

Arsenal, the defending champions, opened the season with two victories and kept clean sheets in both.

Chelsea, meanwhile, have become one of the most entertaining teams in the competition.

7 goals scored
5 goals conceded

after beating Fulham 3-2 and Brighton 4-3.

That second number matters.

Chelsea are not simply winning.

Chelsea are creating wild matches.


The question: can chaos work against Arsenal?

Chelsea have started both league matches with obvious attacking aggression.

That makes this an ideal test of game control.

If Chelsea can force Arsenal into a fast transitional contest, they may move the match into an environment that suits them.

But if Arsenal can slow the game down, dominate possession and make Chelsea defend for long spells, those five goals conceded in two matches may become much more significant.

After90 metrics to watch

  • Expected goals — xG
  • Expected goals against — xGA
  • Shots following turnovers
  • Fast attacks
  • High recoveries
  • Penalty-area entries
  • Attacks completed in under 10 seconds
  • Performance after taking the lead

But there is one metric we particularly want to study:

What happens immediately after Chelsea lose the ball?

If Arsenal can reach the penalty area with only a few passes after regaining possession, that could expose the central weakness in Chelsea's approach.


An early title test?

It would be unreasonable to call a Matchweek 3 fixture decisive in the title race.

But it can tell us something important about Chelsea.

A victory would not suddenly make Chelsea champions.

But if Xabi Alonso's side can produce a balanced, competitive performance against Arsenal, the discussion around Chelsea as genuine contenders will become more serious.

After90 Question

Chelsea have scored seven and conceded five. What happens when they face the league's best game-control team?


2. Ipswich vs Liverpool: Is Liverpool's Problem Really Attacking?

Liverpool enter Matchweek 3 in a position few expected after a summer of major changes.

2 matches.
2 draws.
The same scoreline twice: 2-2.

They drew with Newcastle and then took another point against Nottingham Forest.

At the same time, Bradley Barcola arrived from Paris Saint-Germain in another major attacking investment.

It would be easy to build the entire story around the new signing.

But there is a more important question.

Liverpool have already scored four goals. So why should another attacker be the solution?

The attack has not disappeared.

The bigger problem may be what happens when Liverpool's attacks end.


This is a test of control, not scoring

Ipswich may appear to be an ideal opponent for Andoni Iraola to finally claim his first league victory.

But the real test is different:

Can Liverpool play 90 minutes without turning the match into a race?

We will monitor:

  • Liverpool's xGA
  • Shots conceded after losing possession
  • Opponent penalty-area entries
  • Average time required to regain possession
  • Percentage of counterattacks reaching the final third
  • Distance between midfield and defence
  • Performance after taking the lead

If Liverpool win 4-2, the headlines will probably talk about the attack returning.

But the same underlying problem may still exist.

A controlled 2-0 win with fewer opposition chances and better transition protection could actually be far more important for Iraola.

After90 Question

Barcola has arrived. But does Liverpool need more attack — or more control?


3. Everton vs Manchester United: Was the Ipswich 5-2 Win Really a Turning Point?

For Manchester United, Matchweek 3 gives us the perfect opportunity to evaluate the previous result.

After a disappointing start, United responded by beating Ipswich:

5-2

with Bruno Fernandes scoring a hat-trick.

The scoreline was impressive.

But the question should not be:

Are Manchester United back?

The better question is:

Has Manchester United's actual performance changed?


Everton could be the perfect test

Everton have already shown a preference for direct, quick attacking football after regaining possession.

That is exactly the type of approach that can create problems for United.

Ipswich were able to find useful spaces against United, while defensive transitions were also one of the issues in their opening defeat.

So if that problem has not been solved, Everton are likely to test it directly.


What should we watch in United?

There are six numbers more important than the final result:

  1. Shots conceded after possession losses.
  2. How often Everton break beyond United's midfield line.
  3. United's open-play xG.
  4. Bruno Fernandes' share of the team's total chance creation.
  5. Chance quality rather than total shot volume.
  6. Performance before and after the opening goal.

Some teams look excellent once they lead and space begins to appear.

The more important test is whether they can create solutions when the score remains 0-0.

After90 Question

5-2 looked like a statement. But do the numbers confirm that Manchester United have actually changed?


4. Manchester City vs Coventry: What Did £458m Actually Buy?

Manchester City enter Matchweek 3 with maximum points after winning their opening two matches.

But after a summer in which City's spending reached approximately £458 million, the final score against Coventry is not the most interesting thing.

The structure of the team matters more.


The new Manchester City still looks built around control

Despite all the discussion about a major squad rebuild, one of the most interesting early numbers comes from passing.

After the first two rounds, Manchester City had completed:

1,315 passes

while:

94.6% of their passes were short

one of the highest proportions in the competition.

That raises an important question.

Did City spend hundreds of millions to become more vertical — or to rebuild the possession machine?

We want to monitor:

  • Passes per attacking sequence
  • Progressive passes
  • Average midfield positions
  • Passes between the lines
  • Possession losses
  • Recoveries within five seconds
  • Speed of progression from midfield into the penalty area

City may win comfortably.

But the most interesting part will be:

how the team moves the ball.

After90 Question

£458m later, has Manchester City's identity changed — or just the names?


5. Nottingham Forest vs Tottenham: Poor Finishing or a Bigger Problem?

For Tottenham, the question has already become simple — and uncomfortable.

2 matches.
2 defeats.
0 goals.

Again, 180 minutes is too early to declare a crisis.

But Matchweek 3 can bring us closer to a diagnosis.


Forest may be the ideal tactical problem for Spurs

Nottingham Forest have shown a strong preference for direct football.

Tottenham, meanwhile, want to push players forward and build aggressively.

That creates a very interesting tactical matchup.

If Spurs commit large numbers forward, the space behind midfield may become the most important area of the game.

This could test Tottenham's rest defence more than almost anything else.


And what about the attacking problem?

We need to separate two possibilities.

Scenario 1

Tottenham are creating good chances but failing to finish.

That is primarily a finishing issue and may correct itself quickly.

Scenario 2

Tottenham are not reaching good scoring positions in the first place.

That is a more serious structural problem.

So we need to track:

  • xG
  • xG per shot
  • Penalty-area touches
  • Passes into the box
  • Big chances
  • Striker receptions inside the area

If Tottenham finish Matchweek 3 without scoring and those underlying numbers are also poor, the warning signal becomes much stronger.

After90 Question

Zero goals in two games. Do Tottenham need a better finisher — or better chance creation?


6. Hull City vs Aston Villa: The First Real Test of the Surprise

There is a smaller story that could become a very big one.

Promoted Hull City have started with two wins from two.

6 points from 6.

Aston Villa, meanwhile, have opened with two defeats.

Does that mean Hull are suddenly a strong Premier League team and Villa are poor?

Of course not.

And that is exactly why this match matters.


Are Hull's points supported by performance?

This is one of the best After90 tests of the round.

We want to compare:

actual points versus underlying performance

using:

  • Goals vs xG
  • Goals conceded vs xGA
  • Shots for and against
  • Big chances
  • Goalkeeper performance
  • Transition goals
  • Set-piece contribution
  • Percentage of match time spent leading

If Hull have six points despite relatively weak underlying numbers, the start may be difficult to sustain.

But if they are genuinely creating better chances than their opponents and limiting high-quality opportunities, we may be looking at a real story rather than an early-season surprise.

After90 Question

Hull have six points from six. Is the surprise only in the results — or in the numbers too?

That is exactly the type of trend After90 should try to identify before everyone else does.


The Number of the Round: 13 of 32

If there is one number to remember before Matchweek 3, it is this:

13 of the 32 goals in the previous round came from fast attacks following a change of possession.

It is more than an attacking statistic.

It tells us something about how Premier League matches are currently being played.

That is why we will be watching something that may become more important than possession itself:

What happens in the first ten seconds after winning the ball?

That could become one of the defining metrics of the Premier League season.


After90 Trend Check

From Matchweek 3, we can begin a new weekly After90 feature.

Instead of making final judgments, we classify trends into three levels:

🟢 REAL SIGNAL

Performance and results are moving in the same direction.

🟡 NEED MORE DATA

There is a pattern, but the sample is still too small.

🔴 EARLY WARNING

The result may be hiding an underlying performance problem.

After Matchweek 3, we will have six hypotheses to test:

Team / StoryKey Question
Arsenal & ChelseaControl or chaos?
LiverpoolAttack or control?
Manchester UnitedReal improvement or one exceptional game?
Manchester CityHas the identity changed?
TottenhamPoor finishing or poor creation?
Hull CityTemporary surprise or genuine signal?

Beyond the 90

Matchweek 3 will not tell us who will win the Premier League.

But it may begin to tell us:

which stories are worth believing.

Are Chelsea genuine contenders?

Can Liverpool control matches?

Has Manchester United really improved?

Is the new Manchester City actually different?

Are Tottenham suffering from poor finishing — or a deeper tactical problem?

And are Hull simply enjoying a strong promoted-team start, or are they one of the season's first genuine surprises?

After the final whistle of Arsenal vs Chelsea on Sunday, we should not simply return to the results.

We should return to these six questions.

And place one of three labels beside each one:

🟢 Confirmed
🟡 Still under examination
🔴 Warning sign

Because three matches do not define a season.

But they may be enough to begin seeing:

the shape the season is taking.


Sources

  • PremierLeague.com — Matchweek 3 tactical analysis, fast-attack trends, Manchester City passing profile, Everton's direct attacks and the Forest–Tottenham tactical matchup.
  • Reuters — Arsenal vs Chelsea preview and Mikel Arteta's comments.
  • Reuters — Liverpool vs Nottingham Forest and early-season results involving Tottenham and Hull.
  • Reuters — Bradley Barcola's move to Liverpool.
  • Reuters — Chelsea 4-3 Brighton and Manchester United 5-2 Ipswich.
  • Reuters — Manchester City's early-season form and summer transfer spending.